Keeping track of review status
Posted: Thu Jan 18, 2018 4:18 am
Hi all.
I know this topic has been batted around a few times on the forums, but I'm seeking your advice.
I have 42 Flare projects containing 16,444 htm files and 441 snippets, generating 39 CHM targets and 46 PDFs, and it would be useful to track when the topics have been reviewed. I know I could use tags, but our work (as for most Tech Authors) comes in peaks and troughs and I would have to go about adding and editing tags to topics at peak times, which is considerably less than ideal.
One suggestion that has been raised by my colleague is to maintain a spreadsheet that lists all the different chapters in the PDFs (most of the PDFs and CHMs use very similar TOCs) to give the date reviewed and name of reviewer, and I'm heading in that direction, but I wonder if you have any other suggestions that I could put forward.
I know this topic has been batted around a few times on the forums, but I'm seeking your advice.
I have 42 Flare projects containing 16,444 htm files and 441 snippets, generating 39 CHM targets and 46 PDFs, and it would be useful to track when the topics have been reviewed. I know I could use tags, but our work (as for most Tech Authors) comes in peaks and troughs and I would have to go about adding and editing tags to topics at peak times, which is considerably less than ideal.
One suggestion that has been raised by my colleague is to maintain a spreadsheet that lists all the different chapters in the PDFs (most of the PDFs and CHMs use very similar TOCs) to give the date reviewed and name of reviewer, and I'm heading in that direction, but I wonder if you have any other suggestions that I could put forward.