Whose help is this anyway?

This forum is for all Flare issues related to the DotNet Help target, and the Dot Net Viewer
MikeKatz
Sr. Propeller Head
Posts: 133
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 5:54 pm

Re: Whose help is this anyway?

Post by MikeKatz »

Mike Hamilton wrote:The people have spoken and MadCap has listened! :0)

The plan right now is to alter the DotNet Help viewer to make it more in line with the requests we have received. One of the biggest problems is the timing. All of our dev resources are turning and burning to get Flare version 4 out so this solution will be for that release {/bracing for stone and bottle throwing}. The good news is that we will try and have this new behavior in the Flare version 4 beta refresh that is coming out next week so that people will be able to test and provide feedback on the implementation.

What will the new behavior be?

There are three common methods to launch a DotNet Help system:
1. In a context sensitive manner from the application.
2. By double clicking an icon.
3. By selecting it from the Start>Programs> menu in Windows.

The existing Flare 4 beta has already turned the splash screen off for example 1 calls above (context sensitive links). For next week’s beta refresh we plan to also disable the splash screen for calls made through example 2 (clicking an icon). The only time that the splash screen will now appear is if someone launches it from the Start menu programs group.
Thanks Mike!
Mike
BL_N
Propeller Head
Posts: 68
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 1:17 pm
Location: The Coffee Shop (yum!)

Re: Whose help is this anyway?

Post by BL_N »

Wonderful news, indeed! Thank you for the update!!
"I" before "E" except after "C" or when sounded as "A" as in 'neighbor' and 'weigh'.
forfear
Propellus Maximus
Posts: 766
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 3:37 am
Location: Jungle Jingles

Re: Whose help is this anyway?

Post by forfear »

amazingly responsive. all the best with the v4 releases mateys....tis crunch time in software dev terms.
If you submit your bug feedback request here, the more likely it'll get fixed or included in a future release
Open Utilities PageLayout Resizer for Flare/Blaze | Batch builder
mikejp
Propeller Head
Posts: 33
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 2:05 am

Re: Whose help is this anyway?

Post by mikejp »

I started this thread (way longer ago than I care to remember) fully expecting to told that I was too dumb/tired that evening to find the correct options, rather than - as far as I can tell -start the first and only really acrimonious discussion MadCap and its user-base have had. Here's hoping it's also the last! I reckon we've all won here, including and especially MadCap.

Sadly, the company I was working for then chose to revert to R####### (for a wholely unrelated reason) so won't benefit. And the company I work for now uses - you guessed it - so I won't either, at least not in the immediately foreseeable future. That aside, I still keep a watching brief on MadCap, and will evaluate Flare 4 on release (rather than its beta).

So, I guess this may be my last post for a while.

Fare well, bretherin ;-)
forfear
Propellus Maximus
Posts: 766
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 3:37 am
Location: Jungle Jingles

Re: Whose help is this anyway?

Post by forfear »

hi mike nice to hear from you.. this could indeed be the longest running thread on the forums.

i guess its the bundlin that did it isn't it? oh well...anyway strong products coming up...till the next job i guess.
If you submit your bug feedback request here, the more likely it'll get fixed or included in a future release
Open Utilities PageLayout Resizer for Flare/Blaze | Batch builder
RamonS
Senior Propellus Maximus
Posts: 4293
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 9:29 am
Location: The Electric City

Re: Whose help is this anyway?

Post by RamonS »

Mike, you just need to pick your jobs more wisely. :lol:
forfear
Propellus Maximus
Posts: 766
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 3:37 am
Location: Jungle Jingles

Re: Whose help is this anyway?

Post by forfear »

RamonS wrote:Mike, you just need to pick your jobs more wisely. :lol:

hahaha....well, that's another way around it. :lol:
If you submit your bug feedback request here, the more likely it'll get fixed or included in a future release
Open Utilities PageLayout Resizer for Flare/Blaze | Batch builder
brettzalkan
Jr. Propeller Head
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 2:29 pm

Re: Whose help is this anyway?

Post by brettzalkan »

Thrilled to hear about the attention the dotNet View has gotten. Does it remain a requirement that the Help Viewer must still appear in the All Programs menu when our software is redistributed? Are we now able to suppress this behavior? If not officially, is there a hack?

Thanks,

Brett
RamonS
Senior Propellus Maximus
Posts: 4293
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 9:29 am
Location: The Electric City

Re: Whose help is this anyway?

Post by RamonS »

Typically, you can instruct the installer script to do a post-install cleanup which would include ditching that entry from the Start menu. I also do not know which registry entries the viewer needs and if there are any dlls that need registering. You could try things out a bit and see what you need to do besides writing the files that the help viewer needs. It could very well be that you don't need to run the installer from MadCap, but can roll it into your own.
tbean
Propeller Head
Posts: 48
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 1:59 pm
Location: SE Pennsylvania

Re: Whose help is this anyway?

Post by tbean »

If I understand Mike's post from July 3rd correctly, then the unwanted behavior will largely be gone IF you are using Flare 4 and DotNet Help Viewer 4. What if you're still using 3.1?
Mike Hamilton wrote: ...
The plan right now is to alter the DotNet Help viewer to make it more in line with the requests we have received. One of the biggest problems is the timing. All of our dev resources are turning and burning to get Flare version 4 out so this solution will be for that release {/bracing for stone and bottle throwing}. The good news is that we will try and have this new behavior in the Flare version 4 beta refresh that is coming out next week so that people will be able to test and provide feedback on the implementation.
...
Tracey
LTinker68
Master Propellus Maximus
Posts: 7247
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:38 pm

Re: Whose help is this anyway?

Post by LTinker68 »

tbean wrote:If I understand Mike's post from July 3rd correctly, then the unwanted behavior will largely be gone IF you are using Flare 4 and DotNet Help Viewer 4. What if you're still using 3.1?
You'll have to upgrade. If you have a maintenance contract then you would have gotten the upgrade for free.
Image

Lisa
Eagles may soar, but weasels aren't sucked into jet engines.
Warning! Loose nut behind the keyboard.
tbean
Propeller Head
Posts: 48
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 1:59 pm
Location: SE Pennsylvania

Re: Whose help is this anyway?

Post by tbean »

Well, phooey. Upgrading is not an option, at least not today.

If it's not possible to build this into the UI as a 3.1 bug fix, then is it possible for MadCap to publish directions on how to make the modifications manually? I know that Lisa posted an older-version workaround (back in 2/2007, on page 4) and that Marc had some success with it. Is that workaround applicable to 3.1?

Thanks --
Tracey
Tracey
Richard Ferrell
Propellus Maximus
Posts: 840
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 10:11 am
Location: Inside California

Re: Whose help is this anyway?

Post by Richard Ferrell »

That option would still work even in V3.1

It not possible for us to patch the 3.1 SDK to allow this feature, But the SDK for Flare V4, does remove the Caption and startup image.
Richard Ferrell

Certified Madcap Trainer
Image
tbean
Propeller Head
Posts: 48
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 1:59 pm
Location: SE Pennsylvania

Re: Whose help is this anyway?

Post by tbean »

Thanks, Richard.
Tracey
brettzalkan
Jr. Propeller Head
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 2:29 pm

Re: Whose help is this anyway?

Post by brettzalkan »

It not possible for us to patch the 3.1 SDK to allow this feature, But the SDK for Flare V4, does remove the Caption and startup image.
There's a Flare SDK? Does this just refer to the info for hooking up context-sensitive Help, or is there something more substantial?
LTinker68
Master Propellus Maximus
Posts: 7247
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:38 pm

Re: Whose help is this anyway?

Post by LTinker68 »

brettzalkan wrote:There's a Flare SDK? Does this just refer to the info for hooking up context-sensitive Help, or is there something more substantial?
It's for hooking DotNet Help to your app. http://www.madcapsoftware.com/downloads ... ables.aspx
Image

Lisa
Eagles may soar, but weasels aren't sucked into jet engines.
Warning! Loose nut behind the keyboard.
Richard Ferrell
Propellus Maximus
Posts: 840
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 10:11 am
Location: Inside California

Re: Whose help is this anyway?

Post by Richard Ferrell »

the SDK is just for Dot Net Help, If you need help CSH help on other outputs see the following Knowledge base article.

http://kb.madcapsoftware.com/default_csh.htm#CSH1005F
Richard Ferrell

Certified Madcap Trainer
Image
Aaron Peronto
Jr. Propeller Head
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 11:27 am

Re: Whose help is this anyway?

Post by Aaron Peronto »

RamonS wrote:Typically, you can instruct the installer script to do a post-install cleanup which would include ditching that entry from the Start menu.
We are including the DotNetHelpViewer merge module in our deployment project for our application.
Is there a way to get rid of the desktop MadCap icon as well as the start/programs menu items?
I am trying to find some sort of reference for adding a post-install custom action to our deployment project (or something similar) that will allow me to remove these icons from the user's desktop when we have completed our installation steps.

Also, thanks for making the changes to the 4.0 Viewer. However, I do get a pop-up when I first run the new viewer on the client's machine that says something about getting faster searches by installing some DB tool. Is there a way to prevent this message from coming up or is this just something they will have to see once and dismiss it? Not a huge deal but I hate confusing the end users by asking them these sorts of questions that they really should not be making decisions about.

Thanks.
Aaron Peronto
Richard Ferrell
Propellus Maximus
Posts: 840
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 10:11 am
Location: Inside California

Re: Whose help is this anyway?

Post by Richard Ferrell »

I would log this as a feature request

https://www.madcapsoftware.com/bugs/sub ... lare&v=4.0
Richard Ferrell

Certified Madcap Trainer
Image
Tom
Propeller Head
Posts: 46
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:39 am

Re: Whose help is this anyway?

Post by Tom »

Hi,
On Tue Nov 28, 2006 10:32 am, 'mikejp' started this topic. And now (december 2008), there is a new version of the DotNet Viewer (4.1). And clearly the marketing of MadCap refuses absolutely to take the customers serious.
There are three serious points:

- we are software-developers and our application is administrative software for company's. So why the hell must we bother our users with your compelling screen for updates (like Adobe, but there we are talking about general uasage of the PDF-reader and a general used fileformat.... A helpfile is used in the context of the product of another company). They will have to install them at your site and at your command (because chosing 'No' works only for one instance of running the viewer). So "who's help is it anyway"?????? Why do you as a company take over the version control for thomething that should be helpful for de products of our company??? Don't we have any say in this???

- Starting het help is much to slow for a customer needing quick support encountering problems with our application. They are not in the mood to wait for your Splash logo.
And of course we buy MadCap as third party product to be helpful for our customers, but showing the name of a third company everytime our users need help is not our policy (whose 'software is it anyway''???).

- The name and logo in the menu.... Well.... more than enough has been said. (whose helpfile is it anyway???).

Now with version 4.1 of the viewer en no single progress at all, and no sign of any understanding of your customers, the use of your product in context and the market for MadCap Flare, we lost all hopes and decided to go back to HTML (yes...., in RoboHelp). :evil: :evil:
RamonS
Senior Propellus Maximus
Posts: 4293
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 9:29 am
Location: The Electric City

Re: Whose help is this anyway?

Post by RamonS »

And RoboHelp puts less advertising in their HTML Help? I agree that ideally the DotNet Viewer should be at least configurable so that the advertisement can be turned off or reduced to a one liner in the about box.
In regards to update prompts, you get those from any browser or 3rd party product that can run as a stand-alone as well. While I don't like it it is common practice in the software industry and compared to Apple's forced updates that always install all this iTunes garbage the MadCap prompts are considerably easy going.
The slow start is clearly a DotNet runtime issue. Every single DotNet desktop app I used so far is a slow starter, typically due to the sluggish runtime performance and / or the runtime compile that is going on (MSSQL Management Studio is a nice and annoying example). Sure, when you compare it to the CHM Viewer from Microsoft there is a huge difference, but the CHM Viewer is compiled to machine code and does not get interpreted like the DotNet stuff. While I understand your frustration with that you are barking up the wrong tree. Call Microsoft and tell them to make better platforms. One might blame MadCap for picking DotNet as their development platform, but there aren't many other alternatives for making a product of this scale, maybe Delphi, but good luck finding capable Delphi developers.
Richard Ferrell
Propellus Maximus
Posts: 840
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 10:11 am
Location: Inside California

Re: Whose help is this anyway?

Post by Richard Ferrell »

The Splash logo has been removed from Flare V4.1, When you make the call from the application, you can disable this.
Richard Ferrell

Certified Madcap Trainer
Image
Post Reply