lacastle wrote:KevinDAmery wrote:Also, someone mentioned the style presets--why can't I put my corporate styles there? And why isn't there a style reset there?
Kevin,
This doesn't really have anything to do with Flare anymore, but it is possible to put your corporate styles in the style box. You just have to click the Manage Styles icon in the Styles bar and Import your styles into the Normal template so they'll display with a new document.
I can manage .DOT files fine--but does that put them in the ribbon is the question? Putting them in the styles box (like in Word 2003 and earlier) isn't the issue.
It gets better: we have three different .DOT files that we use, depending on the purpose of the document (different colour schemes depending on whether it's a technical document or a marketting document). That flexibility is precisely why Word supports multiple .DOT files and the ability to attach them to a document. But if ONLY the styles in Normal.Dot appear in the ribbon, it kills that flexibility. Microsquish seems to want all new Word documents to look like the styles they like in Redmond.
Again, I'm not averse to the concept of the ribbon (I like the idea of having tools swap in and out depending on what you're doing) but in order to be really workable you have to be able to customize which tools are in which toolboxes. As it is, it seems to be a one-size-fits-all implementation, and the one-size seems to be chosen for M$'s conception of the lowest common denominator.
So to bring it back to Flare, I'm not against Flare having a ribbon, but PLEASE make any new UI changes actually work for us (and preferably be customizable). The styles should come from my stylesheet, not from some common list of presets, the tools in each ribbon should be definable by the writer, etc. In short, Madcap shouldn't be deciding how I work. (And in fairness, Madcap has been doing that well so far--it's just that the implementations of the ribbon to date have not, so I'd hate to see Madcap fall into that trap.)