Hi,
We have an application that has been developed in VS.Net 2003. Hence while giving out the application we just install >net framework 1.1 only we don't care about 2.0. My question is if we want to give our users Dot Net help does the user machine need .Net framework 2.0?
Is .Net framework 2.0 necessary on user's machine?
Re: Is .Net framework 2.0 necessary on user's machine?
i would imagine so... i am not an expert in this area though.
If you submit your bug feedback request here, the more likely it'll get fixed or included in a future release
Open Utilities PageLayout Resizer for Flare/Blaze | Batch builder
Open Utilities PageLayout Resizer for Flare/Blaze | Batch builder
-
- Senior Propellus Maximus
- Posts: 4293
- Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 9:29 am
- Location: The Electric City
Re: Is .Net framework 2.0 necessary on user's machine?
I'd assume so as well since the Viewer is a .NET application and for that it needs the runtime installed.
New Book: Creating user-friendly Online Help
Paperback http://www.amazon.com/dp/1449952038/ or https://www.createspace.com/3416509
eBook http://www.amazon.com/dp/B005XB9E3U
Paperback http://www.amazon.com/dp/1449952038/ or https://www.createspace.com/3416509
eBook http://www.amazon.com/dp/B005XB9E3U
-
- Propellus Maximus
- Posts: 840
- Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 10:11 am
- Location: Inside California
Re: Is .Net framework 2.0 necessary on user's machine?
For the Viewer, Dot Net 2.0 is required on your end users machines, If they are running XP, With Vista this is not needed as it already has Dot Net 2.0 installed.
Richard Ferrell
Certified Madcap Trainer
Certified Madcap Trainer
Re: Is .Net framework 2.0 necessary on user's machine?
You might want to take a look at:
msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/47a587hk(vs.71).aspx
msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/47a587hk(vs.71).aspx