slow, slow, slow
slow, slow, slow
Hello,
My name is Tom and I'm tech writer from New Jersey. This is my first post. I just got Flare installed a few weeks ago because my company wanted to use XML structured authoring. (Even though the topic files are actually .html files, but that's another topic). Honestly, I'm not too happy with Flare. After reading all the positive reviews about it over the past few months, I'm pretty let down. Anyway, here's my question:
Flare runs painfully slow. Everything from starting up to compiling. What's especially slow is the preview function. Any idea what I may be doing wrong here? It's a new project, so there's not many topics. No images, no multimedia. We have up-to-date PCs here, too.
Regs,
Tom
My name is Tom and I'm tech writer from New Jersey. This is my first post. I just got Flare installed a few weeks ago because my company wanted to use XML structured authoring. (Even though the topic files are actually .html files, but that's another topic). Honestly, I'm not too happy with Flare. After reading all the positive reviews about it over the past few months, I'm pretty let down. Anyway, here's my question:
Flare runs painfully slow. Everything from starting up to compiling. What's especially slow is the preview function. Any idea what I may be doing wrong here? It's a new project, so there's not many topics. No images, no multimedia. We have up-to-date PCs here, too.
Regs,
Tom
Hi Tom! Some questions RE performance
Is your pc a pentium 4? How much memory do you have? Which version of Flare? I am running Flare v2.5.1 and the only slowness I have is starting Flare (it is a little slow, maybe 4 seconds) and the Index search. We have a large Index and 11 projects merged so it sometimes takes a 2-3 seconds to display in the output. But I can share w/ you my performance settings for the target if you feel that your output is slow.
Building and publishing is very fast. I always check 'Upload only changed files' when publishing.
I have 1.49 GB of RAM on my Flare pc.
Also, is your project on a network drive or local on your C drive?
Flare does take a little getting used to but as a former software tester and RoboHelp author I am now quite happy.
Building and publishing is very fast. I always check 'Upload only changed files' when publishing.
I have 1.49 GB of RAM on my Flare pc.
Also, is your project on a network drive or local on your C drive?
Flare does take a little getting used to but as a former software tester and RoboHelp author I am now quite happy.
Madwoman
-Okay it started raining again...
-Okay it started raining again...
-
- Propellus Maximus
- Posts: 1979
- Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 11:18 am
- Location: Crossroads of the West
- Contact:
Most users who complain about speed are usually trying to store files on a network and access them over the network (which is MUCH slower than working locally, especially if you have to do it over a VPN [at least, that is MY experience]).
Here is what I do:
I use the same version control software as the engineers; they carved out a space for my documentation. I check my source files (not any output files!) into the version control system. I keep a local sandbox copy that I update locally. Every day I commit my changes to the version control system. With a few drawbacks, this is a great system. I get to work on my local machine (my laptop) so I can work anywhere, with or without a network connection. When I'm ready, I upload to my version control, knowing that if anything goes terribly wrong at any point, I've got the version control as a backup.
Once I started using version control software, I decided that I'll never go back. Backed up networks don't even compare in usefullness. And since the engineering group is likely using source control anyway, you can just tie into whatever they are using.
Here is what I do:
I use the same version control software as the engineers; they carved out a space for my documentation. I check my source files (not any output files!) into the version control system. I keep a local sandbox copy that I update locally. Every day I commit my changes to the version control system. With a few drawbacks, this is a great system. I get to work on my local machine (my laptop) so I can work anywhere, with or without a network connection. When I'm ready, I upload to my version control, knowing that if anything goes terribly wrong at any point, I've got the version control as a backup.
Once I started using version control software, I decided that I'll never go back. Backed up networks don't even compare in usefullness. And since the engineering group is likely using source control anyway, you can just tie into whatever they are using.
-
- Propellus Maximus
- Posts: 840
- Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 10:11 am
- Location: Inside California
Thanks for your responses. I use Tortoise SVN as source control, but I work locally and then post to it. (I don't work on the network.) I'm on Flare 2.5. The PC has a Celeron processor (2.4 ghz) and 512 mb of RAM. Do I need more than 512mb? I have 29gb of hard disc space available. The installation seemed to go OK, so I'm not sure what's going on. Maybe I'll try to reinstall. I'm also in contact with our help desk to see if they can find anything. I'll keep you posted.
Overall performance is slow. For example, even when I type it takes a while for the characters to display. This doesn't happen right away; it normally starts after I've been working for an hour or two. Building the target on a relatively small project can take up to 5 minutes.
Anyway, thanks again. Just wanted to see if anyone else had experienced this problem. Must be something on my side I guess...
Overall performance is slow. For example, even when I type it takes a while for the characters to display. This doesn't happen right away; it normally starts after I've been working for an hour or two. Building the target on a relatively small project can take up to 5 minutes.
Anyway, thanks again. Just wanted to see if anyone else had experienced this problem. Must be something on my side I guess...
-
- Propellus Maximus
- Posts: 1979
- Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 11:18 am
- Location: Crossroads of the West
- Contact:
What else are you using on your system while Flare is running? I believe (not positive on this, but this is my memory) that Flare requires 512 MB of memory as a minimum standard. I am using 1 GB of RAM to give my OS some space to run and so I can run other programs as well while I'm running Flare. So while you technically meet the 512 requirement, I wonder if you wouldn't find that performance improves if you were to switch to a computer with more RAM, or if you upgraded the RAM in your primary work station.
I dunno. Hope this helps.
I dunno. Hope this helps.
-
- Propellus Maximus
- Posts: 840
- Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 10:11 am
- Location: Inside California
-
- Senior Propellus Maximus
- Posts: 4293
- Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 9:29 am
- Location: The Electric City
Also some more basic questions...when did you degunk the drive last and did a defrag on it? There is tons of garbage that applications and Windows itself leave behind that gum up the works. Unfortunately, Flare cannot be excluded from the list.
Try deleting temporary files and defrag the drive. I am always impressed how much impact this has.
Try deleting temporary files and defrag the drive. I am always impressed how much impact this has.
New Book: Creating user-friendly Online Help
Paperback http://www.amazon.com/dp/1449952038/ or https://www.createspace.com/3416509
eBook http://www.amazon.com/dp/B005XB9E3U
Paperback http://www.amazon.com/dp/1449952038/ or https://www.createspace.com/3416509
eBook http://www.amazon.com/dp/B005XB9E3U
-
- Propellus Maximus
- Posts: 1985
- Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 8:18 am
- Location: Darn, I knew I was around here somewhere...
Re:
Not to get picky, but that's hardly what I'd call an up-to-date PC (to quote your first post). 2.4 GHz Celerons came out over 3 years ago. For production work I'd consider that an antique.tmartin92 wrote:The PC has a Celeron processor (2.4 ghz) and 512 mb of RAM.
And I would definitely recommend more than 512 MB of RAM. You have to run the OS, Flare, and any other applications (including your company's application if you need to run it while your documenting) all in that amount of memory. Personally, I consider 1 GB to be the minimum just to run Windows these days, let alone any apps on top of that.
I'm running a 3 GHz dual-core Xeon (based on the Core architecture) here with 2 GB of RAM. Performance is not an issue, even when I am running Flare, Word, Excel, a browser with multiple tabs, virus scan, and my company's app all at the same time. Basically, I'm running the same hardware as our developers use.
Until next time....
Kevin Amery
Certified MAD for Flare
Kevin Amery
Certified MAD for Flare
-
- Senior Propellus Maximus
- Posts: 4293
- Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 9:29 am
- Location: The Electric City
Re:
Well, you are a developer! Just because you do not crank out object-oriented code and stored procedures doesn't mean that your work can be done with less resources. I work with a 3.4 GHz P4 and 3GB RAM, which I think provides a fair amount of power. I definitely recommend upping the RAM amount.KevinDAmery wrote: Basically, I'm running the same hardware as our developers use.
New Book: Creating user-friendly Online Help
Paperback http://www.amazon.com/dp/1449952038/ or https://www.createspace.com/3416509
eBook http://www.amazon.com/dp/B005XB9E3U
Paperback http://www.amazon.com/dp/1449952038/ or https://www.createspace.com/3416509
eBook http://www.amazon.com/dp/B005XB9E3U
I can definitely tell you having an older CPU and not having extra RAM makes a big difference. My home computer is a Pentium III. Can't remember how much RAM. But it's definitely slooooower than my work computer. I also have a home automation program running on my home computer that runs on the .NET platform, too. I'm assuming having two programs using the .NET platform at the same time isn't a problem, but it is a Microsoft-designed platform, so it's possible that that also slows down Flare. At one point I couldn't even install Flare if the other app (and .NET) was running, but MadCap fixed that problem.
Lisa
Eagles may soar, but weasels aren't sucked into jet engines.
Warning! Loose nut behind the keyboard.
-
- Propellus Maximus
- Posts: 613
- Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:21 am
- Location: Off in the dark....
Hi,
Check these things:
1. Verify that your local anti-virus is not scanning .htm/.html files.
2. Verify that any network anti-virus scan is also configured to exclude .htm/.html.
3. Disable QoS on XP.
4. Add another 512MB of ram.
IMHO, 512MB is not sufficient to run anything serious if you have XP. If your box is controlled by your IT department, you might want to ask them to take a close look to see which if any services they can remove. Every bit of RAM is precious in a low-memory situation. Also, as Ramon mentioned, a defragging is important. Use a defragger that will defrag the MFT and the pagefile. You certainly can't afford to be thrashing the cache if you want to see any speed.
Check these things:
1. Verify that your local anti-virus is not scanning .htm/.html files.
2. Verify that any network anti-virus scan is also configured to exclude .htm/.html.
3. Disable QoS on XP.
4. Add another 512MB of ram.
IMHO, 512MB is not sufficient to run anything serious if you have XP. If your box is controlled by your IT department, you might want to ask them to take a close look to see which if any services they can remove. Every bit of RAM is precious in a low-memory situation. Also, as Ramon mentioned, a defragging is important. Use a defragger that will defrag the MFT and the pagefile. You certainly can't afford to be thrashing the cache if you want to see any speed.
Trent.
Certifiable.
umm...
I meant MAD Certified.
Official Propeller Beanie Owner
Are you on Flare's Slack channels? PM me for an invitation!
Certifiable.
umm...
I meant MAD Certified.
Official Propeller Beanie Owner
Are you on Flare's Slack channels? PM me for an invitation!
-
- Propellus Maximus
- Posts: 1985
- Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 8:18 am
- Location: Darn, I knew I was around here somewhere...
Re:
Exactly the rationale I used when they asked me what kind of system I needed. And as you can see, it worked....RamonS wrote:Well, you are a developer! Just because you do not crank out object-oriented code and stored procedures doesn't mean that your work can be done with less resources.KevinDAmery wrote: Basically, I'm running the same hardware as our developers use.
Until next time....
Kevin Amery
Certified MAD for Flare
Kevin Amery
Certified MAD for Flare
Thanks much for all your replies. It sounds like the consensus is that my PC is the culprit. Unfortunate, since my system is within the system requirements that MadCap lists for Flare 2.5. I'll definitely try all your suggestions and report back if there's any change. Most likely, I'll just request some more RAM.
Thanks again,
Tom
Thanks again,
Tom
-
- Propellus Maximus
- Posts: 613
- Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:21 am
- Location: Off in the dark....
The problem will only get worse as your project grows larger. RAM is most likely to be holding you back. Unless your drive is ridiculously fragmented, it's unlikely to be a problem.
You guys all have such wonderful systems for production work. I'm stuck between an oldish Terminal Server with a dozen other users, and a desktop from 2000.
You guys all have such wonderful systems for production work. I'm stuck between an oldish Terminal Server with a dozen other users, and a desktop from 2000.
-
- Propellus Maximus
- Posts: 613
- Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:21 am
- Location: Off in the dark....
I've been there, believe me. At one point a couple years ago, I was building a 20000 topic robohelp project on a pIII with 512MB. It took almost 4 hours a build.
Trent.
Certifiable.
umm...
I meant MAD Certified.
Official Propeller Beanie Owner
Are you on Flare's Slack channels? PM me for an invitation!
Certifiable.
umm...
I meant MAD Certified.
Official Propeller Beanie Owner
Are you on Flare's Slack channels? PM me for an invitation!
-
- Senior Propellus Maximus
- Posts: 4293
- Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 9:29 am
- Location: The Electric City
....until RoboHelp crashed without giving an error message. That is what happened to me more often that I'd needed.
New Book: Creating user-friendly Online Help
Paperback http://www.amazon.com/dp/1449952038/ or https://www.createspace.com/3416509
eBook http://www.amazon.com/dp/B005XB9E3U
Paperback http://www.amazon.com/dp/1449952038/ or https://www.createspace.com/3416509
eBook http://www.amazon.com/dp/B005XB9E3U
-
- Propellus Maximus
- Posts: 613
- Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:21 am
- Location: Off in the dark....
I didn't have many problems with RoboHelp crashing. Flare crashes much more often than RH did, in my experience. But the crashes really have very little effect on my work.
The RoboSource Control server, on the other hand, drove me insane. I created a template in our IT case logging software just so I could send my semi-weekly request to restart the service without writing it out...again. Then, there's the lost time waiting for IT to respond as three writers can't update the help until the service gets restarted.
The RoboSource Control server, on the other hand, drove me insane. I created a template in our IT case logging software just so I could send my semi-weekly request to restart the service without writing it out...again. Then, there's the lost time waiting for IT to respond as three writers can't update the help until the service gets restarted.
-
- Propellus Maximus
- Posts: 613
- Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:21 am
- Location: Off in the dark....
OK. The extra RAM seems to be doing the trick. (We added another 512MB to my 512.) This is especially true for the build function. The problem I was having with the characters -- appearing slowly as I typed -- is much better, though it's still gets a bit sluggish if I don't reboot from time-to-time. I can live with that.
Thanks so much for all your help. Down the line I guess a better PC will improve things even more. As a writer with a small start-up, however, software, extra memory, and new PCs aren't always possible. Getting Flare was not easy, and I guess that's why I was a bit disappointed when this performance issue came up.
Someone in a previous post mentioned to \"always build computers, houses, and spacecraft above minimum code.\" Good advice. But I'm just building an online help system. I guess my point is that Flare's system requirements should be adjusted to reflect reality. I had to eat some crow after pushing for Flare and then having to explain to my boss that it wasn't running right. Luckily, he was fine with adding RAM to my system; so there is no harm done.
Thanks again for your help,
Tom
Thanks so much for all your help. Down the line I guess a better PC will improve things even more. As a writer with a small start-up, however, software, extra memory, and new PCs aren't always possible. Getting Flare was not easy, and I guess that's why I was a bit disappointed when this performance issue came up.
Someone in a previous post mentioned to \"always build computers, houses, and spacecraft above minimum code.\" Good advice. But I'm just building an online help system. I guess my point is that Flare's system requirements should be adjusted to reflect reality. I had to eat some crow after pushing for Flare and then having to explain to my boss that it wasn't running right. Luckily, he was fine with adding RAM to my system; so there is no harm done.
Thanks again for your help,
Tom
-
- Propellus Maximus
- Posts: 613
- Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:21 am
- Location: Off in the dark....
I'm glad that advice helped. Several months ago my desktop died and needed repair. While it was being worked on, the IT dept gave me a loaner. It was an older, slower box, but with twice the RAM. I used it for an entire publish cycle (PDFs and help). My own box came a couple days prior to the next publish cycle. The difference was very drastic. The old high RAM box appeared twice as fast as my hot rod with half the RAM.
Now I'm running a dual-core and 4GB. I'm using the /3GB switch in boot.ini so that my apps get 3GB instead of the expected 2GB allocation in a 4GB system. It's _much_ faster than either desktop I used.
RAM doesn't always fix everything, but it goes a long way in that direction.
Now I'm running a dual-core and 4GB. I'm using the /3GB switch in boot.ini so that my apps get 3GB instead of the expected 2GB allocation in a 4GB system. It's _much_ faster than either desktop I used.
RAM doesn't always fix everything, but it goes a long way in that direction.
Trent.
Certifiable.
umm...
I meant MAD Certified.
Official Propeller Beanie Owner
Are you on Flare's Slack channels? PM me for an invitation!
Certifiable.
umm...
I meant MAD Certified.
Official Propeller Beanie Owner
Are you on Flare's Slack channels? PM me for an invitation!